Christian Femdom

Saint Joan of Arc
A Christian Soldier that inspired a nation and the world

In this page we publish stories and links to articles that are related to Christian Femdom. The virtue of humility is praised in Christianity. Some outstanding girls deserve to be exalted by humble service and obedience to them. Therefore serving and honoring them improves the virtue of humility. The views expressed by these linked sites are their own. We list them here because they might be an inspiration to those who seek Christian Femdom

Publishing a link here is not an indication that we approve the content ideology. We provide a forum for ideas on Christian Femdom
The Christian Goddess

Contact us if you have an article on this subject that you would like to see published here

We are seeking mutual links with Christian Femdom Groups and blogs. Contact us

Saint Joan of Arc: A woman leader of men

A Christian femdom relationship would be a relationship were the woman assumes the dominant role and the man the submissive roles. Majority of women is naturally predisposed for submission. and moreover most human cultures are patriarchal. So there is the peer pressure to conform to social norms.

This article came from the femdom Gougle group Women Supremacy. We publish it here for information and neither approve it nor disaprove it, nor verify its accuracy. If you wish to publish something related to Christian Femdom contact us

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, Oct 13 2010 8:46 am
From: arah

Why Women And The Bible Don’t Mix

After thousands of years of recorded history, we’re just now
arriving at a point where women are starting to receive fair and equal
treatment in many societies. It’s an irrefutable historical fact that
some of the major sources of this unsolicited oppression were drawn
from references of women’s treatment in the Old and New Testaments.
This chapter will show that the Bible takes a clear and undeniable
stance in its advocation for the unequal treatment of women.
Furthermore, I will prove that the authors of the Bible intended for
women to play the role of a man’s servant from birth until death. I
will consistently and successfully defend this position using the
words of God, allegedly speaking through Moses. Through this
demonstration, I hope you will see that the incredibly dishonest
teachings of Moses arose from an earthly source inferior to an
omniscient deity. Subsequent works of Paul and his peers show only how
gullible they were in so readily accepting the Old Testament
scriptures as fact.

After reading this chapter, I hope you will have a greater
awareness of how the Bible instructs men to treat women. More
importantly, I hope you will appreciate the lack of divine inspiration
behind such commands encouraging this mistreatment. The only
alternative is to conclude, yet again, that a deity with desires this
immoral is clearly not worthy of observance.

The Rules Of Marriage

Let’s start our analysis at the “beginning.” Everyone has heard
the story of God becoming angry with Adam and Eve for eating the
forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden. Although God punishes both for
disobeying his directions, the author clearly places the majority of
the blame on Eve for tempting her husband. God says to Eve, “thy
desire is to be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee” (Genesis
3:16). Since the other suppressing punishments on the couple, such as
Eve’s childbirth pains, are still in effect, we have no justifiable
reason to think that the servitude punishment applies solely to Eve
and not the gender as a whole. If the Bible is the true word of God,
this passage demonstrates his desire for women to live life in
subservience to men. In actuality, however, someone most likely
invented this portion of the patently unreliable story as a
justification for the ongoing inferior treatment of women.

Chapter 21 of Exodus provides us with some very detailed
instructions from God on women and marriage. For example, in the
instance that a father sells his daughter to another man who is not
pleased with her, she must be redeemed. Regardless of the amount of
satisfaction that the girl provides for the man, God’s rules still
allow him to acquire another wife. If he so chooses, the first wife is
not allowed to leave unless her master refuses her food, clothing, or
other marriage duties (Exodus 21:7-11). These words would later serve
as justification for men, such as King David, who had hundreds of
wives and concubines. We’ve also learned in this passage that women
are to be sold as slaves and treated as sex objects. If you dislike
this conclusion and still believe the Bible to be the divinely
inspired word of God, you must either unwillingly follow God’s
derogatory and dehumanizing orders or take an opposing position
against the almighty.

The demoralizing instructions for daughter selling aren’t the
only rules of marriage that God sanctions. If a man decides he no
longer wants to be married to his wife, he can attempt to have her
killed by claiming that she lost her virginity prior to their
marriage. Following this accusation, the woman must then provide
sufficient physical evidence, such as a bloodstain, to demonstrate
that his accusations are fraudulent. In the event that she fails to
prove her innocence of this “crime,” she is to be stoned to death
because of this utmost act of disgrace. Guilty until proven innocent
is the law within God’s court. Any woman who accidentally tears her
hymen due to an injury or other non-sexual act is simply out of luck
because she could never prove her virginity. Thus, she would be at the
mercy of her husband throughout her entire life. If evidence is
produced to exonerate the woman in question, the accuser is fined a
couple pounds of silver and forced to stay married until death
(Deuteronomy 22:13-21). In this case, what does the man really have to
lose?

Some rules following the death of a man are relevant to his
wife’s well-being. According to the rules of Moses, the deceased
father’s inheritance goes entirely to his sons. If he has no son, it
goes to the daughters. After that, the inheritance should go to the
closest male relatives (Numbers 27:8-11). Not only do the boys of the
household have priority over the girls, the wife is also noticeably
absent from the will. Instead, God’s law forces her to marry her
husband’s brother, provided she doesn’t already have a son with her
former husband. However, the brother-in-law has the right to refuse
the marriage; the woman does not (Deuteronomy 25:5-9).

Menstruation is a natural occurrence in the lives of most women.
However, the God of the Pentateuch despises this biologically
necessary bodily process and gives instructions on how to deal with
these treacherous circumstances. During menstruation, God deems the
woman unclean. No one shall have any contact with her for seven days
or until the bleeding stops. God deems anyone or anything she touches
unclean. If she touches another person, God deems that person unclean
until he bathes. In fact, the same goes for anyone who touches
something that she previously touched (Leviticus 15:19-30). All this
uncleanliness is resolved by needlessly killing two doves. Admittedly,
there are similar laws for male ejaculation, but men can actually
suppress these events to some extent.

Childbirth is another natural event that God deems foul. If a
woman gives birth to a boy, she will be unclean for seven days while
she undergoes the same ritual for her menstrual period. She must then
be purified for thirty-three days and barred from entering worship
during this time. If she produces a girl, the sentence of solitary
confinement is doubled to fourteen and sixty-six days, respectively
(Leviticus 12:1-5). In addition to God unfairly designating women as
filthy individuals following childbirth, this passage heavily
insinuates that girls are dirtier than boys because it punishes a
woman more harshly for giving birth to a female child.

Woman’s Darkest Hour

Rape, the paramount fear of many women, rears its ugly head in
the Bible as well. Fortunately, God ensures that the authors list it
as a crime under a few circumstances. Unfortunately, God permits the
sexual violation of women on more than one occasion. More
unfortunately, the fine for committing one of the most heinous acts
known to man without God’s permission is only a pound of silver to her
father and a forced marriage to the victim if she’s not already
engaged or married (Deuteronomy 22:28-29). Yes, God’s idea of justice
for the female victim is to be horrendously punished again by forcing
her to marry the man who savagely attacked her. This disgusting rule
is nowhere near what most people would consider an ethical resolution,
and it’s certainly not a decision rendered by any court I’d like to be
facing.

If a man rapes an engaged virgin who doesn’t cry loud enough to
draw attention, the community should consider the attack consensual if
it took place within the city. Thus, the whore must be stoned to death
per God’s instructions. It obviously doesn’t matter if the woman is
too scared to scream because the law makes no such exception. The man
will be stoned to death as well, not because he committed a brutal
atrocity against the woman, but only because he “violated another
man’s wife” (Deuteronomy 22:24). Note the shamefully sharp contrast in
disciplinary action between raping a woman with a husband and raping a
woman without a husband: death versus a pound of silver. Since it’s
all the same to the woman, it now becomes clear that God feels the
husband is the one who is the victim of the attack.

As I previously mentioned, the Bible regrettably provides some
situations in which rape is entirely permissible, even encouraged, by
the Hebrew god. Recall the rule of marriage specifying how a man can
force his daughter to marry and sleep with another man. This in itself
is completely reprehensible and rises to the level of rape if the
woman is unwilling, but the outlook for women only worsens as we
continue our reading.

In the matter of Moses’ war victory over the Midianites, God had
previously commanded him to build an army and defeat the enemy. After
successful completion of this task, his army takes thousands of war
prisoners. Moses then orders his army to kill the remaining men, boys,
and women who have already slept with a man, “but all the women
children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for
yourselves” (Numbers 31:17-18). If taking a human war trophy based
solely on the prisoner’s gender and sexual status isn’t implied
permission to commit rape, I honestly don’t know what is. Even God
receives thirty-two virgins as his share of the spoils, but they’re
handed over to the priest for obvious reasons (Numbers 31:40-41).

The “women children” mentioned in the passage certainly included
young girls. Some female inhabitants of the city had to have been
several years away from entering puberty, but don’t pretend these
barbaric savages capable of killing defenseless women thought twice
about waiting a few years for the girls to mature. Well, what
eventually becomes of these foreign women kidnapped in battle?

When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the Lord thy
God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them
captive, And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a
desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife; Then thou
shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and
pare her nails; And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from
off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and
her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and
be her husband, and she shall by thy wife. And it shall be, if thou
have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will;
but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make
merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her. (Deuteronomy
21:10-14).

More Old Testament Atrocities

One other mistreatment by omission should come to mind upon
completion of reading the Pentateuch: the failure to mention the
explicit impermissibility of sexual relations between fathers and
daughters. The only such instance that comes to mind is the record of
Lot’s daughters getting him drunk to become pregnant by him (Genesis
19:30-38). However, the author tells the story using disturbingly
tranquil commentary. Had God considered this a reprehensible act, one
would assume that it would be noted in some way for its
distastefulness. In fact, Moses provides a long list of people with
whom we are not to have sexual contact in Leviticus 20:10-21, but
noticeably absent from this list is the debauchery of a father with
his daughter. We also know from previous analyses that daughters are
the sole property of their fathers. Finally, we can safely assume that
these father-daughter relationships existed thousands of years ago, as
they secretly do now. The omission of this regulation can only lead to
the conclusion that it was permissible, or at least somewhat
condonable, for a father to rape his daughters.

The historical books, Joshua through Esther, begin the popular
trend of multiple-wife lifestyles. Among those who have several wives
and/or concubines are Gideon, Elkanah, David, Rehoboam, Abijah, and
Solomon, who I believe is the winner with 700 wives and 300
concubines. Even so, divinely inspired biblical authors wholeheartedly
claim that God looks upon these men favorably. Would we expect God to
view these individuals in a positive light if this lifestyle was
displeasing to the almighty?

We find several more cruelties perpetrated against women in
these historical books. Such atrocities include a woman given away as
a prize (Judges 1:12-13); a woman offered as a sacrifice (Judges
11:29-39); married daughters given to other people (Judges 15:2);
rape, murder, and mutilation by a mob; (Judges 19:22-30); abduction of
virgins (Judges 21:7-23); purchasing of wives (Ruth 4:10 and 1 Samuel
18:25-27); and God punishing David by allowing his son to sleep with
his wives and concubines, an act for which the women were later
imprisoned (2 Samuel 12:11-12, 16:22, 20:3).

If you read the book of Proverbs, you will find more sayings
than I care to list that reiterate how women can be evil, strange,
adulterous, foolish, contentious, etc. The book concludes with an
observation on the rarity of a virtuous woman. According to the
author, if you find one such woman, she’s worth far more than rubies
(Proverbs 31:10). Enlightened readers, on the other hand, should
quickly realize that all humans are more valuable than material
possessions, regardless of their sex, color, or creed.

The books of prophecy, Isaiah through Malachi, have the most
vivid images of God tormenting women. Some examples of God’s actions
not previously covered include the giving away of people’s wives
(Jeremiah 8:10), justifying a woman being raped (Jeremiah 13:22),
making men “become as women” (Jeremiah 50:37), denouncing menstruation
(Ezekiel 18:6), telling Hosea to acquire a wife that he knew would be
purchased (Hosea 3:1-2), aborting children in their mothers’ wombs
(Hosea 9:11-12 and 13:16), ridiculing an army by labeling them women
(Nahum 3:13), and taking part in a war concluding with women being
raped (Zechariah 11:4). Again, I don’t feel there’s any reason to
worry over such matters because none of this will ever happen due to
direct intervention by the fictitious version of God depicted in the
Old Testament.

New Testament Atrocities

The outlook doesn’t substantially improve for women in the New
Testament either. The author of Ephesians insists that wives should
submit to their husbands in everything (5:22-24). While it’s true that
the author later instructs men to love their wives and treat them
well, what does a devout Christian woman do when her husband decides
to break the bounds of his instructions by asking her to embrace
something she knows is evil? Remember, the woman has no right to
divorce the man. In addition, the author fails to mention the
existence of any out clause for her in such a situation. It would
appear as though she has no choice but to comply with his orders if
she is to obey the words in the scripture.

The authors of Colossians, Titus, and 1 Peter all agree that
women should submit to their husbands (3:18, 2:5, and 3:1,
respectively). The books of Peter also forbid women to wear any type
of decorative jewelry to adorn their bodies (1 Peter 3:2-6), refer to
women as the weaker vessel of the couple (1 Peter 3:7), and deem Lot
to be a righteous man even though he once offered his daughters as a
suitable alternative for homosexual rapists surrounding his house (2
Peter 2:8 referring to Genesis 19:4-8). A man with the immoral
qualities of Lot cannot be regarded as righteous unless you discount
the inherent rights of all people, more specifically, the inherent
rights of women.

The author of Timothy also follows suit with his bigoted
opinions of women. Like Peter, he says that females shouldn’t wear
decoration or try to usurp authority over their husbands. Instead,
women should remain silent and fully submissive to them. As he also
declares that Adam was not the one who was deceived in the Garden of
Eden, Eve is clearly the party implicated as being responsible for the
downfall of man (1 Timothy 2:9-15). This author isn’t particularly
kind to widows either. He says we should leave these women in need
because their rewards will arrive as an answer to prayer. A widow
experiencing pleasure while she’s still alive, on the other hand, is
already dead in the afterlife. In the author’s eyes, the only
respectable widows are at least sixty years old, have had only one
husband, and have been well known for their positive accomplishments
in life. In contrast, younger widows aren’t worth assisting because
they eventually remarry, become idle, or venture from house to house
with their gossip (1 Timothy 5:5-15).

As we discussed near the beginning of this book, Paul is no
doubt the single most important figure in getting Christianity to
where it is today. Unfortunately, he is also one of the most sexist
people you’ll find in the New Testament. Paul is very adamant in his
belief that women aren’t useful for much more than sexually satisfying
their husbands. He even remarks that it’s good for a man to refrain
from touching a woman, but he realizes the need for a man to have
sexual contact and permits each to have a wife (1 Corinthians 7:1-2).

Paul also tells a story in his letter to the Romans about men
“leaving the ‘natural use’ of the woman” to have sexual relations with
other men (Romans 1:27). The passage is more or less saying that the
natural use of a woman is to function as a derogatory sexual outlet
for a man. He continues to spread his bigoted beliefs in a letter to
the Corinthians by unambiguously declaring the man to be the head of
the woman, similar to the way that Jesus is the authority figure for
men. Paul also says women, who are the glory of men, were made for
men, who are the glory of God (1 Corinthians 11:3-9). The clearly
implied chain of importance goes Christ first, man second, and woman
last.

Paul also establishes a few ground rules before the men can
bring their women to church. The women are to choose between
concealing their heads and having their hair completely shaven. Later,
Paul takes away the latter choice by declaring a shaved head to be a
disgrace in need of covering (1 Corinthians 11:5-7). He also doesn’t
permit women to speak in church because that also is a shame. If they
have a question concerning the material, they must ask their husbands
at home. Paul also reminds us once again, “they are commanded to be
under obedience” according to the law (1 Corinthians 14:34-35). If you
ever attend a Southern Baptist church, you will notice that its
members tend to remain clung to these values in some fashion.
Unfortunately, some ultra-conservative members continue to take these
biblical guidelines into their homes.

Are Women Equal To Men?

Dozens more examples of cruelty to women exist throughout the
Bible, but I feel this will be sufficient in making my case. Women had
suffered terribly for thousands of years because of what men, not any
god, wrote in the Bible. To some extent, women still endure coarse
treatment stemming from their own religious beliefs and those observed
by their husbands. I hope you realize that the authors of the
Pentateuch were not divinely inspired to write declarations of women
as the sole property of men. Instead, the books should once again read
as though some group is depending upon the gullibility of the people
to serve their own desires. In essence, the Old Testament authors
misled the New Testament authors into believing that they actually
recorded the “wonderful” and “loving” God’s authentic orders. Not
knowing any other society than the one in which they were raised, the
New Testament authors felt compelled to endorse these regulations.

Many Christians continue to adhere to these cruel, senseless,
and morally bankrupt codes, but most have illogically reasoned their
way out of following God’s eternal commands. Many Christians have
declared that the Old Testament regulations died when Jesus arrived,
but three key verses can once again tell us that this simply isn’t a
valid deduction. “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the
prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil” (Matthew 5:7). “For
verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one
tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be
fulfilled” (Matthew 5:18). “And it is easier for heaven and earth to
pass, than one tittle of the law to fail” (Luke 16:17). Furthermore,
as the New Testament instructions postdate Jesus’ life, the failed
suggestion doesn’t even attempt to resolve the problems created by New
Testament authors. Even if we allow the repeal of these old
traditions, does this act justify centuries of biblical oppression?
For the reasons presented in this chapter, I urge all men to use their
intrinsic common decency, not the Bible, when deciding how to treat a
woman.